2012-08-14, 10:32 AM
ImagineAll Wrote:Except that wasn't what was said, and contextually doesn't fit. I thought one of Southperry's big guidelines was to take things at face value for the sheer fact that ambiguity often leads to fall back retorts such as this?
And what context are you pulling out of what orifice there?
If you're having to claim context, out of her having said nothing but that one line, to substantiate your interpretation, you're not taking it at face value, are you?
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.