Moderation Enforced

The only pathetic part I see in this thread is how discussion is encouraged but nothing can be done about it. I mentioned Reddit earlier in my posts and a subreddit that did this (/r/BestOf) just had an experiment for a week to see higher enforced moderation and gave the users the ability to form their opinions to change the ruling and lay their case. 5 days into the week they ran a poll to see who liked the enforced rules and then 2 days later the stricter moderation won. Some people are unhappy sure, but it collectively got the most votes for the change. Unfortunately here in Southperry discussion here about recent changes doesn't lead to anything nor will it ever. You can say all you want but your statements will never change the stubbornness of the rule placement here.

I still am curious of what I said over at post 100 though, which was ignored:

I am, I dislike both players and feel their opinion should be stripped away. It was bad enough tolerating them on basil. Also this is not as dramatic you are making it. You think they are going to block regular's posts for hour's to double check to see his range is legitimate? No, it's to make sure that questionable posts avoid 8 pages of conflict that would result in clean up that could lead to even more drama, such as "Why was he banned and why not him".

Perspective man, perspective