Am I the only one who tries to play as "legit" as possible?

Until recently, those transactions were not documented.

"Recently" as in a 2 years ago? Where do you think hellban came from.

I'm not sure what experiences you've had, but I'm fairly certain that in the court of law, one is innocent until proven guilty; the burden of proof lies on the accuser.

Wanna talk about law huh, let's talk law! By IRS' terms its the taxpayers responsibility to show documentation. The IRS nor any state agency will send you a letter saying "You owe us money, here's why". You have to show them why they are wrong. You have a right to an appeal, but an officer can still throw your ass in jail on bail depending on the crime. Just like nexon could ban you and ask you to prove or provide sufficient evidence that you aren't guilty.

This is often the result of lack of alternatives. When the 'non-cheaters' fail to create a reasonable alternative to a 30 attack mask, do you expect people to use nothing? When there is no punishment for being 'insecure/impatient', of course these 'children' will go for it.

Yes. By the TOS they are. If you want to bring up big unreasonable comparison's, what's the alternative to weed? To alcohol or other big name drugs? What 'alternatives' do I have to get that feeling of relaxation or rush, the same way weed or cocaine does? Guess that means I get to have it.

When it comes to their heads of development and talking heads, I would agree that they know nothing of the game. However, there are people within the company who play the game, who can provide feedback. These people know more about the game than a majority of these forums, easily.

Demonstrations by hime is by no means "playable" and we're talking a very very thin sheet of ice here. I'm sure most people won't admit they actually play as the interview process asks if you do play nexon games. It's discouraged out of fear of less than wanted intentions. It's been discussed before, it's a double edge sword, but it's there none the less.

You're absolutely right about there being only one definition of legitimate. Are you going to tell me that you have followed the EULA to the letter? If not, then you have lost the right to judge everyone else, as well.

I never denied that, nor do I judge people with such pettyness. I can judge a person on their attitude, their mannerism's and their actions. I can't judge him on how plays the game because I'm not legitimate in that regard, regard being the definition.

This used to be the case; however, as of late, it is obvious that leeching off hackers would not get you banned. If you take a look at everyone who has leeched off a Battle Mage hacker at Crockies, or a Jett hacker at Aliens, or whatever: You will see that these people are still around. Every single one of them should be banned, but aren't.

I can't speak for the company but I think everyone can agree nexon has a tendency to take action a little late. I'll go with the reasonable assumption these players will eventually be delt with based off past action's of new worlds/classes and the top 10 evidently being banned eventually.