2012-07-30, 01:37 PM
Flonne Wrote:So it's OK to have 50+ people injured just because you are being stubborn and won't admit another gun "might" have been helpful?
Personally in a circumstance like that I could see a gun as another asset to do damage rather than protect. I certaintly couldn't make a headshot right off the bat, not at the distance required, anywhere that would be easy/gurranteed/able would have already been unloaded on.
locked Wrote:I'm saying, if someone wants to do something with a gun, like this guy, and has it planned out then he will get a gun somehow.
He was smart, I'll give you that, but I doubt he could get his hands on two ak47's and a shotgun if there were stricter gun regulation's. I could imagine two hand gun's, which frankly would have halved if not more, the death toll.
Stricter gun control, in my opinion, would in fact discourage people like this from trying stunts like this, and even if he was to manage to get a hold on fire arm's, it wouldn't be as dramatic as what we just saw.