2012-07-30, 01:25 PM
KhainiWest Wrote:Depends, which is why I said perhaps. Majority of the wounded be gone, but if you saw the position majority of the death toll would still be in the same. He came into the theater from the right, surprised two rows of people and unloaded. The wounded were the ones who ran away or were farther up in the seats. There's als the perspective of the victims families who would not feel vindicated by simply watching him die. It's too good for him as it strips away all responsbility he had.
So it's OK to have 50+ people injured just because you are being stubborn and won't admit another gun "might" have been helpful?
