2012-07-25, 10:59 AM
Tch..
Lmao. What world do you live in that you get accepted for health insurance automatically? Do you know how many people get their coverage denied even if they can afford it? Almost anybody that is sick gets denied their coverage because the consumer based insurance system is essentially made only to profit those already rich. Millions of sick americans get denied coverage simply because they have a pre-existing condition. The number is about 50 to 119 million people. Is this your idea of a system to support?
Wow. Really? How can one value money more than human life?
Flonne Wrote:1) their own fault for keeping the babies or having them in the first place. If you aren't willing or able to support a child/children, you shouldn't have them; that's not our responsibility to subsidize.What if they were married and got a divorce? Way to presume.
Quote:2)If he's working, he should already have health care; if he works at a very low end job and doesn't, he would fall under the "physically disabled" category in the latter example, and in the former he would not. Not really much more to it than that...while this sort of system would encourage people to get hurt worse if they get hurt at all, it would still dissuade the weak-hearted from trying to take advantage of the system, and let's be honest here, that will be the majority in any situation, not just in this.
Lmao. What world do you live in that you get accepted for health insurance automatically? Do you know how many people get their coverage denied even if they can afford it? Almost anybody that is sick gets denied their coverage because the consumer based insurance system is essentially made only to profit those already rich. Millions of sick americans get denied coverage simply because they have a pre-existing condition. The number is about 50 to 119 million people. Is this your idea of a system to support?
Quote:As to your last point...I will agree to disagree, we have fundamentally different opinions on this subject. I feel that not only is that not the case, but that most people DON'T deserve to be healthy. If you aren't putting something back into the market, you are worthless to society; me saying the disabled deserve healthcare is me meeting you halfway, because honestly, the best system nature has to offer is survival of those who survive (survival of the fittest isn't really a good way to say it, since that does not factor in luck, which is a major variable in all aspects of life whether we want it to be or not). If I were crippled in some way an hour from now I would still say this, but then, I've never been one to care for my own wellbeing, anyway. Call me suicidal by negligence, if you wish. People, creatures, living organisms...none of these groups are equal, within themselves or with the other groups alike.
Wow. Really? How can one value money more than human life?