God's existence--A different approach

I agree, except that there indeed is one thing that can be proven. That is your own consciousness. Because even considering that everything we sense can be an illusion, then there still must be a source for these illusions. I cannot 100% prove you exist, but I can 100% prove that I exist.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cogito_ergo_sum

I kind of agree to this theory. But it can be argued that one cannot prove oneself exists by mere thought because the act of thought cannot be visually defined. Seeing is believing, but thought cannot be seen. The concept of "I" in "I think therefore I am" already signifies that our acknowledgement of ourselves as "I" somehow proves our conscious existence, even though how that's proven is impossible to conceptualize and visualize itself.

Okay, I'll stop now. My brain hurts from this.