2012-07-14, 12:01 AM
My problem with your article is that you meander around; it feels more rough draft than final article.
You go through the effort of pointing out that ToU isn't enforced in the first place, so why does it matter if this is or isn't in there since if it were it'd be as ignored and meaningless as the kill stealing portion is. You end on a completely unrelated note, since the overall theme was allegedly that it should be/could be part of the ToU, but your ending is encouraging Nexon to actually enforce what alredy exists... and overall I don't feel you actually explored your titular question at all.
You go through the effort of pointing out that ToU isn't enforced in the first place, so why does it matter if this is or isn't in there since if it were it'd be as ignored and meaningless as the kill stealing portion is. You end on a completely unrelated note, since the overall theme was allegedly that it should be/could be part of the ToU, but your ending is encouraging Nexon to actually enforce what alredy exists... and overall I don't feel you actually explored your titular question at all.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.