2012-07-12, 12:43 PM
Your counter argument assumes from the other extremes, on one hand it requires the supposition that god is all powerful, and for the rest of your argument you're comparing inanimate objects to sentient ones. They're not even AI's in any meaningful interpretation of the term, so really a stretch. You've no middle ground to stand on.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.

