2012-06-26, 01:32 PM
The rule is not "people you can prove hacked are thrown out". Don't even bother trying.
There is no way to "prove" someone is a hacker.
Unless they admit it, here specifically, we don't care.
Nothing you submit will amount to anything more than hearsay. Doesn't matter if you have videos, screen shots, chat logs, DNA.
We're not forensic technologists here trying to prove your evidence is legitimate and actually ties to a specific person. That would take more time, resources, effort and interest than any of us have.
Ambiguous confessions are not. Anything they can use the excuse of "you misunderstood me" is not an admission.
There is no way to "prove" someone is a hacker.
Unless they admit it, here specifically, we don't care.
Nothing you submit will amount to anything more than hearsay. Doesn't matter if you have videos, screen shots, chat logs, DNA.
We're not forensic technologists here trying to prove your evidence is legitimate and actually ties to a specific person. That would take more time, resources, effort and interest than any of us have.
Ambiguous confessions are not. Anything they can use the excuse of "you misunderstood me" is not an admission.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.