| Poll: Do you think this person should be punished, based on provided evidence? You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| Punish | 4 | 100.00% | |
| Pardon | 0 | 0% | |
| Not enough information to decide | 0 | 0% | |
| Total | 4 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
|
Public Tribunal Case by Pendragon
|
 
2012-06-20, 09:31 PM
WillDaSnail Wrote:I looked at what the "suspect" posted in his "challenge" to Pendragon, and I knew that the "suspect" was outright lying to the community. No one gets a 2 week ban unless they were repeat offenders (and haven't changed their behavior), and I knew this guy was hiding something. There was actually one person who Pendragon admitted his ban was probably the result of a system glitch. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Public Tribunal Case by Pendragon - by WillDaSnail - 2012-06-20, 08:18 PM
Public Tribunal Case by Pendragon - by Raul - 2012-06-20, 08:33 PM
Public Tribunal Case by Pendragon - by Olsi - 2012-06-20, 08:51 PM
Public Tribunal Case by Pendragon - by KajitiSouls - 2012-06-20, 09:31 PM
Public Tribunal Case by Pendragon - by WillDaSnail - 2012-06-20, 10:15 PM
Public Tribunal Case by Pendragon - by SolicShooter - 2012-06-21, 08:36 AM
Public Tribunal Case by Pendragon - by Eos - 2012-06-21, 08:47 AM
Public Tribunal Case by Pendragon - by Aynia - 2012-06-21, 03:31 PM
Public Tribunal Case by Pendragon - by WillDaSnail - 2012-06-21, 07:13 PM
Public Tribunal Case by Pendragon - by KajitiSouls - 2012-06-21, 08:48 PM
|
