2012-06-05, 03:51 AM
ShinkuDragon Wrote:well, it makes it different, my range is 51843~74061, calculator displays 51857~74081, which isn't much, but still, i like calculations perfect ._.
i don't know much (read: anything) of coding, so i have no clue how difficult it would be to fix, but it's something.
i could always run with other polearms to bugtest i guess, but eeh, just my nature of "it must work perfectly in every scenario"
I don't think it'll be difficult to fix. This is how the program's code looks like, well without the UI elements or other pop up windows but still essentially how it runs.
It's just surprisingly annoying to get it precise. When I tested it on my mercedes it was a +/- 1 error, which I figured is good enough but you're giving me a somewhat larger margin. Besides, I enjoy bug catching as it gives me something to do and is ultimately the reason I even posted this.

