Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
I will be posting this link with absolutely no personal opinions or posts besides OP
#5
FenixR Wrote:Weird enough (And don't consider this as me supporting child porn because i don't support that messed up pomegranate), i agree with the court decision.

Mostly because it was the browser cache, everything from a online page you saw with your browser gets saved in there and after a few days it will be deleted. That includes stuff like emails images and stuff.

Proving that the teacher entered a child porn site or something showing child porn with the intention to do so its virtually impossible with the images of the cache alone because he could have been victim of a rickroll-esque type of prank or some weird email prank sending him to that page with the images, and the browser would save the images regardless.

or browsed 4chan.
(being serious here.)

it's a ruling that opens a lot of problems trying to not screw a few unlucky ones.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
I will be posting this link with absolutely no personal opinions or posts besides OP - by ShinkuDragon - 2012-05-09, 06:53 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: