Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Nexon America Inc. v. Gameanarchy LLC
#10
inemnitable Wrote:It was my impression that the anti-circumvention provisions of the DMCA only applied to copy-protection schemes, which it would be hard to argue that Hackshield or w/e pomegranate they use for CA is. I'm pretty sure that encryption itself was not ruled (or perhaps was ruled not) to be sufficient to form a protected copy-protection scheme, so I'm not sure how this stacks up against that.

I can see it now sorta. They didn't violate copy-write by simply bypassing and hacking since they don't really tamper, steal, or claim any CA content right? I think with the private servers, Nexon had some ground because they copied, reused, and profited from the actual game by hosting Nexon's content themselves.

In this case, I don't really know what DMCA can do for just simply hacking.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Nexon America Inc. v. Gameanarchy LLC - by Eos - 2012-04-23, 05:00 PM
Nexon America Inc. v. Gameanarchy LLC - by Eos - 2012-04-23, 05:05 PM
Nexon America Inc. v. Gameanarchy LLC - by Eos - 2012-05-05, 01:27 PM
Nexon America Inc. v. Gameanarchy LLC - by Sephie - 2012-05-05, 06:24 PM
Nexon America Inc. v. Gameanarchy LLC - by Sephie - 2012-05-05, 11:59 PM
Nexon America Inc. v. Gameanarchy LLC - by Eos - 2012-06-23, 08:45 PM
Nexon America Inc. v. Gameanarchy LLC - by Eos - 2012-08-19, 12:36 PM
Nexon America Inc. v. Gameanarchy LLC - by Eos - 2013-02-14, 08:42 AM
Nexon America Inc. v. Gameanarchy LLC - by Eos - 2013-12-31, 08:05 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)