2012-05-03, 08:32 PM
You know what? I am going to pull "the classic 'there's no reason for me to answer, I win the argument'", because this is the second time now that you've responded to me with a one or two sentence response on cherry-picked sections of what I've written. It's pretty obvious that you're just arguing for the sake of arguing and not because you don't understand what's being said, rather I really hope that's what you're doing because I don't want to believe that anybody is so incapable of getting what they want to say across.
In this last post, your first "rebuttal" added absolutely nothing at all to this conversation. Saying that we might be thinking of different meanings of the same word is a complete non-statement in a discussion if you're going to refuse to even admit that you had the wrong idea or confirm what I'm saying. All this "trying to attack you" thing meant is that you pretty obviously have no idea what competitive gaming even meant 10-15 years ago, which because of your latest addition is supported by how you don't recognize that hardcore can both be used to describe games being played in a competitive scene, the people playing it, and the game itself in addition to its other uses.
And while I'm on the subject of missing the point, why yes I did miss the point of kids toys. That is because you are completely awful at getting what you want to say across in a manner that isn't condescending proverbial vomit. Case in point: you couldn't even be bothered to reconfirm what your point was in this because you very likely don't even have a point. I'll try again. Is "sports games" in that last "You missed my point since sports games DO NOT get you running around" referring to video games about sports, or about kids' toys involving sports? If it's the former then you don't have a point and are also an idiot because no video game will get you "running around". If it's the latter, you are an idiot and you also cannot read because my last sentence there pretty clearly gave an example of an entire company that's whole existence hinges on you being wrong.
And just for posterity or for anyone else who reads this, since I already know you can't actually get it through your head:
So yes, I am now trying to attack you because you are acting like a thick-headed doofus. You have made no valid points so far at all. You don't get to completely ignore what people say to you and then claim you're just having a debate.
In this last post, your first "rebuttal" added absolutely nothing at all to this conversation. Saying that we might be thinking of different meanings of the same word is a complete non-statement in a discussion if you're going to refuse to even admit that you had the wrong idea or confirm what I'm saying. All this "trying to attack you" thing meant is that you pretty obviously have no idea what competitive gaming even meant 10-15 years ago, which because of your latest addition is supported by how you don't recognize that hardcore can both be used to describe games being played in a competitive scene, the people playing it, and the game itself in addition to its other uses.
And while I'm on the subject of missing the point, why yes I did miss the point of kids toys. That is because you are completely awful at getting what you want to say across in a manner that isn't condescending proverbial vomit. Case in point: you couldn't even be bothered to reconfirm what your point was in this because you very likely don't even have a point. I'll try again. Is "sports games" in that last "You missed my point since sports games DO NOT get you running around" referring to video games about sports, or about kids' toys involving sports? If it's the former then you don't have a point and are also an idiot because no video game will get you "running around". If it's the latter, you are an idiot and you also cannot read because my last sentence there pretty clearly gave an example of an entire company that's whole existence hinges on you being wrong.
And just for posterity or for anyone else who reads this, since I already know you can't actually get it through your head:
Andross Wrote:Do you not understand how different people can be interested in different things, or are you understanding this but being condescending and smug because "they like something I think is boring or stupid because my way is obviously better so they must be a bit slow"?
Raph589 Wrote:I perfectly understand that people can like different things. Just arguing cause I have nothing better to do and want to find out why people like it. At this point, you still didn't give me a good reason.
So yes, I am now trying to attack you because you are acting like a thick-headed doofus. You have made no valid points so far at all. You don't get to completely ignore what people say to you and then claim you're just having a debate.