2008-11-13, 07:33 PM
XtremeBeast Wrote:I think it's only fair to count what you can already wear. I've owned intense gear for every class. I could make a lvl 10 for any class and include my "projected range" at 150. I mean, wouldn't a 21atk bwg be great to include for hero, pally, drk, bm, mm, nl, and shadower ranges (all under the same name of course)...or i could get hold of an elem wand and make a lvl 10 lukless ice/lit, f/p, and bishop and with the boost of int-gear i could fantasize i'd have a godly 150 ice/lit, f/p, and bishop.
This sort of thread is to not to show who's stronger per se. It's to show who has better gear. Strength relies upon lvls+gear. Scaling low lvls up while scaling high lvls down reflects ONLY the gear. What good is the gear if you can't wear it? I don't run this thread, but in my opinion, only wearable gear that's self-owned should be counted. If you don't have the lvls, then get them. After you can wear your own gear, then submit your range. It takes time to get lvls, a lot can change over the course of that time.
Yeah, I see what you are saying and I agree with you, I don't want to see the same person with their godly equips having like a mule for each class and putting the mules on the list. I was merely joking when I said I wanted to be on the list and when DarthIsis1 said it was ok I just posted my gear for the hell of it. It is really DarthIsis1's decision if I am going to seriously be put on the list, it doesn't really matter to me since I know if we get a few more active Marksmen (I know, I laughed at the thought too) I will get kicked off either way.