2012-02-29, 07:31 PM
I have done my own calculations, and for some reason OSFB is still better DPS than FT. I've been a strong supporter of FT since I discovered it at 120 and it let me train super fast without the need for overpriced skill books.
I really would like to believe you when you say FT does better damage than OSFB.
Could you point out how your calculations differ from mine?
I was calculating Sudden Strike bonus additively, and you assure me it's multiplicative. I have updated the table below to be accurate.
I do not calculate crits or PDR.
I really would like to believe you when you say FT does better damage than OSFB.
Could you point out how your calculations differ from mine?
I was calculating Sudden Strike bonus additively, and you assure me it's multiplicative. I have updated the table below to be accurate.
| Attack | Time/attack | Damage/attack | # Hits/attack | AFA procs/attack | AFA Damage/attack | Total Damage/attack | TOTAL DPS |
| FT | 0.33 | 640% | 1 | 0.6 | 150% | 790% | 2370% |
| OS | 1.33 | 1880% | 3 | 1.8 | 450% | 2330% | 1748% |
| OSFB | 1.89 | 2945% | 4 | 2.4 | 600% | 3545% | 1878% |
I do not calculate crits or PDR.