2012-02-07, 07:53 PM
Alloy Wrote:However, that wouldn't work, since it's like trying to make a line with two points that are the same. Consider the tenth dimension is coordinates (1,1). A line from (1,1) to (1,1) is still a point, since it has no other references.
But that's what I'm saying...it's impossible to properly calculate something greater than "everything"; it would all be considered (1,1), I'm not disagreeing with that. My main idea is stated in one of my first posts; this theoretical "11th" that I am suggesting is "active" redundancy.