Legit or no? - Fighting glitched bosses.

If you have to ask the answer is always no.

So glad that the first response was a statement that is as trite as it is inaccurate.
Clearly, you don't know how questions work, do you? (SEE WHAT I DID THERE?!)

Why do people care so much about this? Do you get to be in a superspecialawesome group or something if you label yourself with something? The game is broken as hell, just play it and don't do something dumb to get yourself banned, that's all you need to know in Maple Story.

inb4 Spanish Inquisition

I'd imagine that it gives people some sense of superiority to claim that they're morally elite, yes.
I didn't ask the question for validation; I was just curious on other players' stances on participating in glitched content.

Personally, I don't see it as game-breaking or giving a ridiculous advantage, so I don't really care.
I'll also not be doing it again as it is boring as hell, and I wouldn't have bothered if I wasn't watching something else.

Killing bosses once a day, that you could kill without too much trouble regardless of bug, should not be a problem. You will not get unfair advantages doing this because there are other options that could give you as much or more EXP. Even if you hunted Castellan till you arse fell off you would not get much more EXP than grinding at LHC. Not to mention Castellan is a meek joke ever since Big bang and is not a bigger threat attacking than he is unresponsive.

Since when was the game all about experience?
There is also the matter of items.

It's also presumptuous to say that everyone who makes runs of glitched bosses could kill them normally.
I was once in a squad at CZak that was doing absolutely fine until someone aggro'd all the arms at once.
From there, it fell apart.
Exidous gave a similar example as well.
Just something to consider.

I have enjoyed reading the discussion.
Appears that the general consensus is that abusing a glitch is okay as long as it doesn't give an advantage that would be considered outrageous on a relative scale.
Not unexpected.