what the fu.ck

The topic of if spending money on virtual entertainment is worth it has already been discussed. I don't think you've read any of the arguments at all, as the discussion is currently about spending money on Nexon is a waste since they fail to provide the measures necessary to secure you spending money on the entertainment they provide. I don't know if I'm using the term right, but I do believe the term to describe what you're doing is beating a dead horse.

It's pretty ironic how you continually accuse me of not reading the arguments, when you continue to either misunderstand or refuse to engage what I'm trying to say.

If the discussion is about whether spending money on Nexon is a waste because they fail to secure the game, then in order to discuss it, we can consider the arguments for and against such proposition, yes? What I'm saying is that it is not necessarily a waste of money because, despite Nexon's failure to secure the game as we'd like, there is still value to their games for reasons I have already mentioned. What I was trying to say is that spending money on Nexon for the game's entertainment value cannot be dismissed in considering whether it's a waste of money to spend money on Nexon, even if the game's not very secure. I'm just pointing out it's a cost-benefit analysis that we all do.

If what you mean by "discussion" is for people to just agree with what you're saying, i.e. for people to pat each other the back and murmur that "the game is quite bad, it's just a waste of money", "yes yes, quite right my good fellow" then, IMHO, that's not really a discussion.