Atuan Wrote:Accusations would imply they don't know what they're talking about. There isn't any mystery to the question.
That's not the point.
[/URL]From that thread:
Panacea Wrote:If the person scammed her, then they are a scammer. There's no accusing going on since it's based on fact, not opinion.
The only "iffy" part of her post is "I've always thought the whole guild was, though".
Sarah Wrote:That's not the point of the rule. Southperry is a place of discussion, not name-calling, flaming and accusations. When you put someone's name out there like that then they lose they've been stained and can no longer speak freely. It opens them up to more harassment. As long as a poster doesn't come out and claim that they've hacked or flaunt it, then their history is of no value here as long as it does not distract from discussion.
Beyond that, Southperry doesn't encourage players to spread rumours that will affect people in the game. So while that player may not be a member here, it is already blatantly obvious that people will not be associating with them--or worse, they could begin harassing them. That is not what Southperry is to be used for.
That is why the rule exists. There is no exception.
It doesn't matter if the accusation is true or false. Though, since he's already admitted to it, I guess it makes no difference.