Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
GMS Server Status Discussion < 2011-11-09
#56
There would be, but they're all on the side we have no visibility to and there's so many we could write a novel.

One would assume they've already checked all the basic things.

If I truly had to hazard a guess, I think it was the renumbering they did. They restacked everything so that more daemons are on less unique IPs.
The two more obvious beginning points from that are that either the boxes aren't specced big enough to handle it or the network cards aren't capable of handling the amount of throughput.

But from there it could continue on to being virtually anything.
It's not having what you want - It's wanting what you've got.


Messages In This Thread
GMS Server Status Discussion < 2011-11-09 - by Eos - 2011-11-02, 01:18 PM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)