mercedez can do me sideways.

They aren't which is why you shouldn't try to draw conclusions from them, understand? Now you're just nitpicking semantics so I'm done, you don't understand.

I don't really care if they are true or not, you are assuming they are correct and so will I for arguments sake, but you're still wrong.

For all the people peaching about be arguing it's 100% relevant to the topic hand, and this whole "MercedesDemonSlayerOverlord" mentality, annoying to see all these bad conclusions drawn and tossed around as facts.

lmao.

Not everything I say is factual or meant to be factual. Arguing over them because you assume it's factual just makes me think you don't understand a statement. Maybe I should add a clause to my post from now on.

First reason is something he said explicitly, second is a fact stated by him. Conclusion is something he also stated explicitly so assuming he implied anything it wasn't at all relevant to the argument he was making.

"Every person I've seen with a Hero's Glove has been a Mercedes"
>I've seen
>I

I'm not stating that every person who has a Hero's Glove is a Mercedes. I'm stating that the people I have seen with the glove are only Mercedes.

"Only Mercedes are on top. Then the top 9 is a mixture of Demon Slayer, BM, and Mercedes.
It's always been like this."

This would be me finding something to relate to the statement I made above. I know the wording sounds like it's a fact but it's just a reinforcement of something I've seen.

You question me over arguing over semantics yet you're doing the same.