2011-10-19, 11:25 PM
Blades4hire Wrote:How would Nexon refund your items?.....
If they somehow did, it would be so extremely exploitable it's not even funny.
1. Move all items to different account
2. Submit hacking ticket
3. Get items back
Oh look i now have 2 copies of all my gear!
I'll put this nicely.
Please read my post again; they have logs, detailing, everything, that, ever, happens, on, their, servers. Just like they can see that a person got a ton of stuff stolen, they can also see that the person is just switching off to another account. And if not, and they get outside help, as soon as the gear hits their account again, they will know, and can ban BOTH people involved.
If they never get their gear back onto that account, then it's the same thing, is it not? Unless they start a new character for the gear, which, while not entirely outside the feasible realm of possibility, is a ton of work for something that might not even work. Also, keep in mind they will also keep address logs of account access.
steveg89 Wrote:This is so derpy. I'm not going to spoonfeed you a bunch of assumptions about their system, especially when you are already assuming it would be done in some blanket motion without regard to checking on the hack claim. It's been determined they do have logs, so let me blow your mind. What if, and this is big, but what if they looked in their logs, and undid the chain of transaction involving your item? You're looking at this in a very one-sided and selfish way because you weren't affected, but for those of us that were this is a big deal.The fact that they've never done that (that I've heard of?) leads me to believe such a system is not implemented? Nobody would know for sure, well, besides the people that may or may not have hacked into the dBs, but even if it is, have they ever USED it? Not saying just because they haven't means they shouldn't start, but they seem to be set in their ways when it comes to (failed) business practice.
Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong and they have done that in the past, by the way, that's just an assumption of mine, not based on any facts.