|
In the name of science
|
 
2008-10-28, 12:09 PM
Quote:Participants were clearly stressed and some must have been embarrassed by the procedure and suffered some loss of self esteem once they had been informed that it had all been a big con. This all constitutes psychological harm.http://www.psychology4a.com/Social%20influence.htm I don't remember if debriefing was introduced before or after his experiment, but research ethics are a pretty recent thing. |
|
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
In the name of science - by butterfλi - 2008-10-23, 02:39 PM
In the name of science - by KajitiSouls - 2008-10-23, 03:01 PM
In the name of science - by butterfλi - 2008-10-23, 03:50 PM
In the name of science - by Lylac - 2008-10-23, 05:01 PM
In the name of science - by IsaacGS - 2008-10-23, 05:13 PM
In the name of science - by Corn - 2008-10-23, 07:23 PM
In the name of science - by Russt - 2008-10-28, 03:17 AM
In the name of science - by butterfλi - 2008-10-28, 12:09 PM
In the name of science - by Harrisonized - 2008-10-28, 09:45 PM
In the name of science - by Corn - 2008-10-28, 09:59 PM
In the name of science - by butterfλi - 2008-10-28, 10:07 PM
In the name of science - by aznegglover - 2008-10-28, 10:12 PM
In the name of science - by Harrisonized - 2008-10-28, 10:19 PM
In the name of science - by Corn - 2008-10-28, 10:25 PM
In the name of science - by Harrisonized - 2008-10-28, 10:29 PM
In the name of science - by Corn - 2008-10-28, 10:37 PM
In the name of science - by Kevo - 2008-10-28, 10:44 PM
In the name of science - by Harrisonized - 2008-10-28, 10:54 PM
In the name of science - by Dusk - 2008-10-30, 01:15 PM
In the name of science - by Lylac - 2008-10-30, 04:57 PM
In the name of science - by MissAsh - 2008-10-30, 06:13 PM
In the name of science - by Azalea - 2008-10-30, 07:55 PM
|
