2011-09-26, 06:01 PM
Luxeraph Wrote:Looked at wiki for some source and found this not sure if its what your looking for since I'm too lazy to read it, but seems to be.
ahh thanks actually. the media lose so much in their translations from science to english. they expected ~7.4ns of systematic error, and got many measurements way too far outside of that to be from what they accounted for.
this is a few interviews by scientific american of other physicists more or less saying "hmm, i bet they forgot something". personally, i think the most interesting one is the guy who says neutrinos from a supernova would have arrived 4 years sooner if they could travel 60ns faster than light. and that begs the question of whether we were even looking for neutrinos associated with supernovae 4 years prior to that observation.

