Botting or not, it is justifiable enough if you don't bother anyone. Heck, I even consider some hackers nice.
In my opinion, it pretty much depends on what you believe to be right. Like when I earned my zhelm, there was superfluous controversy about the 'earning' status (since it was my very first run as a dk/attacker, and no one but I needed that extra helm). The organiser charged me for a helm that should have been left in the altar till oblivion, which I found to be illogical.
If I had to choose whether it is 'botting' or not, I'd say yes; if I had to choose whether it is 'fair' or not, I'd say no; but if you ask me it's right or wrong, it's up to you.
@Clint: Why do you bother? He made a thread asking for opinions and you asked "What does it matter to you?". Sire, we were asked to share opinions, period.
In my opinion, it pretty much depends on what you believe to be right. Like when I earned my zhelm, there was superfluous controversy about the 'earning' status (since it was my very first run as a dk/attacker, and no one but I needed that extra helm). The organiser charged me for a helm that should have been left in the altar till oblivion, which I found to be illogical.
If I had to choose whether it is 'botting' or not, I'd say yes; if I had to choose whether it is 'fair' or not, I'd say no; but if you ask me it's right or wrong, it's up to you.
@Clint: Why do you bother? He made a thread asking for opinions and you asked "What does it matter to you?". Sire, we were asked to share opinions, period.

