2011-08-09, 01:35 PM
octopusprime Wrote:There is no valid point. He's arguing with the way things are as compared to how he feels they should be. It's like someone telling me the sun should be less bright. Nexon does not have an obligation. There is no discussion. If he wanted to argue the possible directions nexon could take or possible re configurations of their methods he should make a thread about it.
No. He's saying how things are in comparison to how they're supposed to be by law.
Quote:There is no might hold up in a legal situation. He's making an argument out of something where there is literally no room for real argumentation. The only person nexon services by not shafting you as a consumer is themselves so they can get more money. Nothing is ever done by them out of obligation to you or I. They have none. It is business practicality. If you want to see one party as being in debt to the other in the consumer-service provider relationship, fine go for it. If you want to publicly insist it's how things actually are, I reserve the right to tell you you're wrong on a fundamental level that I don't think my arguing with you can reach.
The concept is rather simple, if someone is able to pay for a service then they have the right to customer service in the United States, there's no argument about it. Just because the service is free at the start doesn't mean that it disables all forms of customer satisfaction and their obligation of keeping said service open. People are paying for this and it isn't run by donations.
Quote:Was that reply sufficiently long, Locked? Because it's the length of a post that determines the validity of the rationale right?
When the hell did I state that the length of a post determines its validity? Seriously, stop shoving words into my mouth and read the damn post.