2011-08-09, 01:17 PM
Locked Wrote:Completely pointless, it doesn't give you any valid point in comparison to him. I'm pretty sure what Flonne is saying is correct.
There is no valid point. He's arguing with the way things are as compared to how he feels they should be. It's like someone telling me the sun should be less bright. Nexon does not have an obligation. There is no discussion. If he wanted to argue the possible directions nexon could take or possible re configurations of their methods he should make a thread about it.
There is no might hold up in a legal situation. He's making an argument out of something where there is literally no room for real argumentation. The only person nexon services by not shafting you as a consumer is themselves so they can get more money. Nothing is ever done by them out of obligation to you or I. They have none. It is business practicality. If you want to see one party as being in debt to the other in the consumer-service provider relationship, fine go for it. If you want to publicly insist it's how things actually are, I reserve the right to tell you you're wrong on a fundamental level that I don't think my arguing with you can reach.
Was that reply sufficiently long, Locked? Because it's the length of a post that determines the validity of the rationale right?
Flonne Wrote:I don't really care if you ever accept you are wrong and I am right, because I am not a person with low self confidence that feels the need to gain the support of others; instead, I go out, find facts and form opinions for myself, then I save them for when the subject arises provide them with ample evidence supporting my opinion, and if others do not agree, so be it.
That's all well and good, but you have to realize that every "fact" you find is not relevant to every or any given situation.
I'm not going to get into anything in regards to legality and how/if it applies to nexon. You've already made the determination in your mind that if it exists at all that it must naturally apply to this situation because it is about "business." While that may be something that seems like sound reasoning from a logical perspective, it is not the way it works. Business law does not function that way. I don't have the time or energy to take you through 4 credit hours of business law. Yeah you found a "fact." You then assumed this fact was relevant and then decided that you must be right because of it.