2011-08-07, 09:53 PM
RADRaze2KX Wrote:No, I don't give a pineapple about your shadower.You should. He makes your theory laughable.
Really, it wouldn't have to be my Shadower either.
The other Shadower in the video equally negates your post.
RADRaze2KX Wrote:No, I didn't notice that video on page 15 until I read your post, because I didn't want to read 15 pages of repetitious comments before I posted my own.Sounds rationale. I mean, why not post a theory after something has been available long enough for it to be tested?
RADRaze2KX Wrote:CTF can be dominated by a one-man-army if you're skilled enough in any game, so your rhetorical question is moot.No, it renders your statement that "this is going to make CTF a HIGHLY team-based PvP mode" moot.
It makes my rhetorical question spot-on, actually.
RADRaze2KX Wrote:You will notice in THAT video that there are no movement skills in use by the flag-carrier, which for balance purposes would seem to be the logical thing to do, hence my post above that you decided to be a jackass about and bash with your snooty arrogance.I also notice that in THAT video, there are hardly any movement skills used period.
Then again, there was only 17 seconds of actual gameplay, which isn't a very reliable sample size.
I was a jackass about your post because your post served absolutely no purpose.
Mine was a response made in annoyance with your arrogance.
RADRaze2KX Wrote:I'm full of it? No, I missed a single video on page 15 of a very repetitive thread -I'm curious how you're able to conclude that a thread was repetitive despite the fact that you clearly didn't read it.
RADRaze2KX Wrote:you, sir, are just narcissistic as far as your last post is concerned, which is ridiculous considering you came to the same conclusion I did prior to trying it out yourself: http://www.southperry.net/showthread.php...post795485.You sure do like dem big words, partner.
Though, if you really think about it, you should put down those narcassassincitnascism goggles of yours so that you can see the glaring differences between our posts.
See, my post was made before Tespia was up. You know, before there was anything else to go on.
Also notice the choice words:
"Thinking about it, I wouldn't be surprised [SIZE="3"]if[/SIZE] they went Halo-style in Capture the Flag."
Now let's look at yours which was posted two days after Tespia had been released
"I watched the CTF video a few times and I've concluded that while mobility-enhancing skills such as Flashjump and Teleport are in play, the flag carrier [size="3"]will[/size] NOT be able to utilize them. That's how it was in Unreal Tournament, once you picked up the flag, you couldn't translocate without dropping it. This [SIZE="3"]is [/SIZE]going to make CTF a HIGHLY team-based PvP mode, which [size="3"]will be[/size] absolutely amazing... until the hackers pineapple it up."
I made my post clear that it was supposition because, well, that's exactly what it was.
You, on the other hand, made every verbal attempt to assert your conclusion as absolute and fact.
...and then you come at me and declare me the arrogant one?
How about, in the future, you be respectful enough to actually read what others have said before posting something as if your voice is the be-all, end-all?

