FA-Q.

I feel a bit like a pineapple, I had completely discounted the multiplier from the actual skill, a noobish oversight indeed. I do enjoy hearing how things work in practice as I don't get much of that. TBH i spent the last 3 hours today doing mathematical proofs to form a decent explanation of a stance on a nearly-sexist debate (why men and women communicate the way they do and how it is problematic) coupled with my lack of bowmen experience my maplestory research didn't get the attention it deserved.

Thanks for the help on this everyone, White especially.

Edit:

Marksmen are obsolete because other classes can output more damage with the same amount of funding. I know NLs that do 1.5x-2x my damage with the same amount of % stat, and yes, that is kind of depressing. I chose to make a Sniper because of it's rarity back in the day (way before 4th job).

This statement stood out to me, I was curious about the viability of critical rings for a full 95-100% crit chance. I was wondering if the damage stability of full crit was worth the investment by comparison to a stat ring or something of that nature. The reason I was leaning toward MM in the first place was that crit reliability seemed to further augment every investment as a pure multiplier.