2011-07-22, 09:41 PM
Kalovale Wrote:Anything can bear more than one inference. You may care solely for the fact of the matter, but others are going to read it as something else, as the two, scamming and morality, are tightly intertwined.
Alas, in the end, you said what you wanted to say and meant what you wanted to mean. Not a single pineapple was given however it is interpreted.
While I agree, things can bear more than one inference, it doesn't mean all inferences are logically sound. Especially when the inference you take and continue what you think an argument is about has nothing to do with what i'm getting at (or actually related to anything i've said, so where this inference is coming from is beyond me. And when I actually directly explain this prior to your response as well as after that inference becomes absurd to maintain. Yet as should be clear from the following posts, he chose to maintain that. He also found it necessary to insult me. After my very first response to him in fact. Which was (again, i explicitly stated this before his reply which was nothing more than an insult) a mostly humorous, light hearted analogy.
As to the second part, i mostly agree. I do this for diversion. I don't find it terribly important or useful. (sometimes it helps meh practice dat lawyah talk while still relating it to the average man) But i doubt that is your intent. Wait no, not doubt, Infer.

