2011-07-22, 02:19 PM
octopusprime Wrote:This is literally too stupid for me to respond to.
But since I already typed the words i guess i'll do it anyway.
Nope. I'm saying just because you caught someone not being careful does not make you in the right (remember the person who started this was trying to make it a moral issue. which honestly my real response is just lol.).
If you really aren't getting this (you aren't) I'd happily elaborate the concept to you, including the moral void of accidents, provided you don't insult my intelligence over my choice to convey an argument (which other people both understood and saw the validity of) in a semi-humorous way.
Or, more simply, get off your f'ucking high horse.
Oh we are swearing now? XD these arguments always get so heated.
Needless to say, in life people will always be trying to rip you off in one way or another, and others will be sincere, it is up to the buyer, to see to it that he/she knows what she is buying and that it is a good deal, you can't expect to trust every random person who sells you something. And while scamming might be morally wrong, and the scammer is therefore wrong, they did not force you to buy that item, it was your own mistake, so just because they gave you the opportunity to make a mistake, doesn't mean no fault lies with the scammed.
Also that original argument when you replaced scammer with the word hacker, was not clever, and did not logically fit, so yes it was retarded.
MetaSeraphim Wrote:Good boy! Make sure to say that from now on.
Hey, hey... play nice
