Thread Rating:
  • 0 Vote(s) - 0 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB
#13
This should be correct. Using macros because manually executing Dark Sight every time it wears off is virtually impossible. I wouldn't deliberately take advantage of ADS because of Dark Sight's internet latency issues anyway.

An (A)DS + PB macro would always be inferior to damage in comparison to just spamming PB.

An (A)DS + PB*2 macro, to take advantage of the 49% chance to stay in Dark Sight, would be overall 0.75% stronger than just spamming PB.

Notes:

- ADS also makes your Mirror Image hits do 0.77x instead of 0.7x, when the 10% damage bonus is applied.
- I didn't take into account the "Dark Sight Trigger Chance: 20%", which only procs when getting hit. It should work in spamming PB's favour.
- Spamming PB also has other advantages like constant KB?

In conclusion, going out of your way to take advantage of ADS isn't worth it.
Reply


Messages In This Thread
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by Blades4hire - 2011-07-12, 11:03 PM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by Abysseon - 2011-07-12, 11:07 PM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by Valon - 2011-07-12, 11:10 PM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by JoeTang - 2011-07-12, 11:39 PM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by Blades4hire - 2011-07-12, 11:54 PM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by Valon - 2011-07-13, 04:20 AM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by Muppy - 2011-07-13, 10:05 AM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by Raph589 - 2011-07-13, 10:14 AM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by DeanNim - 2011-07-13, 11:22 AM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by MysticHLE - 2011-07-13, 01:11 PM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by serulin - 2011-07-14, 02:23 PM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by Dark Link - 2011-07-14, 03:18 PM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by ShadyPriest - 2011-07-14, 07:20 PM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by octopusprime - 2011-07-19, 04:37 AM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by JoeTang - 2011-07-19, 04:45 AM
ADS+PB vs. Spamming PB - by octopusprime - 2011-07-20, 12:47 AM

Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)