2011-06-09, 02:25 PM
Eosian Wrote:It would be the very epicenter of the entire nature vs nurture argument that's occurring around the religious argument, so yes, it was relevant.
I was discussing the stigma, not what homosexuality possibly is. I don't think choice was probably on their "top reasons to make it a sin" list. In the general discussion it's on topic, but as a response to my quote it didn't retort to anything I posted.
Eosian Wrote:Developmental disorders are a natural phenomenon.
It was a rebuttal to your calling it unnatural.
I seem to recall having asked both of you to stop using this thread as a means to continue your personal bickering.
I don't recall anything hostile in my last post or his post, simply a clarification of our stances, much like our conversation so are we bickering
. Then it's simply misunderstood, I was merely saying that based on the influence of the culture, sex wasn't seen as pleasure, it was seen as a means of procreation, or tried to. So if a women and a women have sex, and they aren't procreating, therefore misusing sex. Better way to put it I suppose.