2011-05-23, 01:32 AM
Alloy Wrote:...small?
If you leave Night Lords just like this, it's like saying "Good luck on that, there's a class that does your stuff better, deadlier, and with more."
I don't know about the bandit branch, never played it, but NLs need a huge tweak. Well, they needed it long before this update anyway.
Wild Hunters vs BMs? Yeah, been there done that.
I would say Shad's need buffs. I went grandpaing w/ a friend that has a 60k range and I, having right at 40k range w/ conc, mw30 and stew, clearly out-damaged him. To me, that says they need some love.
As far as NL's, I really really find it hard to be sympathetic to the plight of NL's. When I go on pb runs, the NL's (normally 3) ALL do more damage than any of the ranged or warrior classes. Those three nl's probably do near or better than the damage of the rest of us combined. If it was just one, i'd say he's a godly funded fluke. Two? Godly funded flukes probably. But three? It's getting too common. And those are just the ones I PB with. I'm not even addressing the nl's I see on the street or at guard ani or any of those things. NL's seem quite potent as they are now and I find it hard to get on board for some large overhaul like Archers, and especially BM's just got, which was desperately needed because of how effective NL's are currently.
Dizzy, I don't agree with your views often times, but your comics are AMAZING! Just wanted to say that.
As for high damage not making a good class, what exactly are you looking for? A more dynamic class? Pick one. A dynamic AND very heavy hitting class? I thought you were talking about balance, which is not what a class is that is both dynamic and heavy hitting (comparatively speaking).
I really don't know how any of you NL's can say that your class is garbage. If you had my gear with my % and an equivalent total attack, you could easily KS me, same gear. How can you say your class is bad?!

