2011-05-15, 02:41 AM
2147483647 Wrote:Actually, if it were successful, the drug can be quite profitable. The real reason this isn't well known is that it's not through clinical testing, so it can't be marketed.
People should stop making blind judgments. Read the article for yourself and ignore the fact that whoever the hell wrote it is ridiculously opinionated. They even linked the article to the research page.
I did read the article and they said clearly that it's not being used because pharmaceuticals aren't using it because they can't profit off of it. That's the same as being greedy, no?