2011-05-13, 08:09 PM
MetaSeraphim Wrote:I did read it, but, what, you want a circle jerk or something? *yawns*
You're defining God by your own way of understanding, by your own beliefs on what should and shouldn't be. You think that if there is a divine being that created everything it wouldn't have created death and such since it could have created a planet where there is no death. You're pouring all your beliefs and understanding about humans to say that God doesn't exist or shouldn't exist with the way the world works. You're defining God by defining that humans defined him to ease their mind and such or whatever.
Whether God is perfect or not such never be part of a debate about whether God exists or not, a being whether perfect or unperfect can create something as proved by the worthless and useless humans who have created many things. Many of them flawed and with weak backgrounds. Recreating the same thing many times to make it better.
And I'm saying you yourself define god by the very means you so "subtlety" mocked me for. You have defined imperfection, a human concept, and attribute it to god. Our imperfections may very well be what is, considered by god to be, perfections (sorry to sound like a after school special). To say something is outside the box you have to define what the box is and the problem is that we barely know what's in this box called the universe.