2011-05-07, 12:09 PM
He's dead.
I don't think Al Qaeda would have said the same thing in a public address if the American government was lying.
also
So you wanted him taken alive, but then once hes dead you want his body paraded about as some sort of trophy?
I can tell you exactly why his body was disposed of in the ocean.
Keeping it in american property risks people having his body potentially be recovered by Al Qaeda. No-one wants more attacks on anyone, keeping it would be a risk with no real advantage.
They couldn't give him a grave, this man was responsible for mass murder, any grave site would be destroyed if it was known his remains were there. Also, would anyone really want tax money spent on his burial? Not really. Dropping it in the ocean stops that, and prevents the other side recovering it and using his body as a symbol, while still giving him a burial.
I don't think Al Qaeda would have said the same thing in a public address if the American government was lying.
also
Quote: US said that they had killed Osama. Why didn't they capture him if he had no weapons?
Quote: US said that they had dunked Osamas body to the ocean. Why did they destroy the evidence so fast?
US didn't publish the photos of dead Bin Laden.
So you wanted him taken alive, but then once hes dead you want his body paraded about as some sort of trophy?
I can tell you exactly why his body was disposed of in the ocean.
Keeping it in american property risks people having his body potentially be recovered by Al Qaeda. No-one wants more attacks on anyone, keeping it would be a risk with no real advantage.
They couldn't give him a grave, this man was responsible for mass murder, any grave site would be destroyed if it was known his remains were there. Also, would anyone really want tax money spent on his burial? Not really. Dropping it in the ocean stops that, and prevents the other side recovering it and using his body as a symbol, while still giving him a burial.