2011-05-03, 11:57 PM
Spoiler
There are many problems with Harrison. The one that's the most blatant, and the one that I will limit my discussion to, is related to his overt support of extremism. The rest of this letter is focused exclusively on Harrison, not because I harbor any ill-will towards him but because it's astounding that he has somehow found a way to work the words "undiscriminatingness" and "saccharomucilaginous" into his memoranda. However, you may find it even more astounding that he's like the man behind the curtain in the Wizard of Oz. Pull back the curtain of particularism and you'll see an unpatriotic warlord hiding behind it, furiously pulling the levers of exclusivism in a lubricious attempt to represent a threat to all the people in the area, indeed, possibly the world. That sort of discovery should make any sane person realize that Harrison sees no reason why he shouldn't represent Heaven as Hell and, conversely, the most wretched life as paradise. It is only through an enlightened, outraged citizenry that such moral turpitude, corruption, and degradation of the law can be brought to a halt. So, let me enlighten and outrage you by stating that Harrison's mercenaries don't want us to unveil the semiotic patterns that Harrison utilizes to consign our traditional values to the rubbish heap of terrorism. That'd be too much of a threat to onanism, phallocentrism, and all of the other depraved things they worship. Clearly, they prefer providing what I call unmannerly, biased hell-raisers with an irresistible temptation to deflect attention from Harrison's unwillingness to support policies that benefit the average citizen.
The long-term consequences of Harrison's words are rarely examined, let alone subjected to scientific scrutiny. By somewhat the same token, although I admit it's not an exact parallel, he who pays the piper calls the tune. With that in mind, I did a little research to find where he gets his money. It turns out that it comes primarily from quixotic spongers, filthy stuffed shirts, andyou guessed itthe most coldhearted charlatans you'll ever see. This explains why we have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that Harrison's ipse dixits have become, or is it sufficient to purge the darkness from Harrison's heart? I apologize if this disappoints you, but my intent was only to elucidate the question, not to answer it. I shall therefore state only that Harrison's orations are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that Harrison can convince criminals to fill out an application form before committing a crime and they promote the mistaken idea that two wrongs make a right.
Does Harrison have trouble living with himself, knowing that he considers our independence to be the most formidable obstacle in the path of his ambitions and business pursuits? The answer may surprise you, especially when you consider that when I'm through with him he'll think twice before attempting to formulate social policies and action programs based on the most postmodernist types of cronyism in existence. As will become apparent one of these days, his older crotchets were scary enough. His latest ones are indeed beyond the pale. Of all the delusions I have ever known, the most arrogant is the idea that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. Still, that doesn't prevent Harrison from conning us into sawing off the very tree limbs upon which we're sitting. He can't seriously believe that he acts in the public interest, can he? The answer should be self-evident so let me just point out that Harrison's convictions are an icon for the deterioration of the city, for its slow slide into crime, malaise, and filth.
The great irony is that Harrison's harangues may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into ignorant ageism. I call upon Harrison to stop his oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon him to be a man of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon him to forgo his desire to manipulate public understanding of racism. He shouldn't show us a gross miscarriage of common judgment. That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions impinge upon our daily lives.
Any meaningful analysis of the situation must allow for the fact that I have to laugh when Harrison says that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of blackguardism. Where in the world did he get that idea? Not only does that idea contain absolutely no substance whatsoever, but he has produced a large number of vicious scribblings. I'm sorry that I can't give each of these the angry retort that it deserves, but I can say that I do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we're having with Harrison. Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I begin the debate about his press releases. In short, Harrison's condescending solutions have done much to pervert the course of justice. I propose, therefore, that we respond by doing what we can to lend support to the thesis that what we are dealing with here is fashion, politics, and money.
The long-term consequences of Harrison's words are rarely examined, let alone subjected to scientific scrutiny. By somewhat the same token, although I admit it's not an exact parallel, he who pays the piper calls the tune. With that in mind, I did a little research to find where he gets his money. It turns out that it comes primarily from quixotic spongers, filthy stuffed shirts, andyou guessed itthe most coldhearted charlatans you'll ever see. This explains why we have a dilemma of leviathan proportions on our hands: Should we fight the warped, distorted, misshapen, unwholesome monstrosity that Harrison's ipse dixits have become, or is it sufficient to purge the darkness from Harrison's heart? I apologize if this disappoints you, but my intent was only to elucidate the question, not to answer it. I shall therefore state only that Harrison's orations are based on two fundamental errors. They assume that Harrison can convince criminals to fill out an application form before committing a crime and they promote the mistaken idea that two wrongs make a right.
Does Harrison have trouble living with himself, knowing that he considers our independence to be the most formidable obstacle in the path of his ambitions and business pursuits? The answer may surprise you, especially when you consider that when I'm through with him he'll think twice before attempting to formulate social policies and action programs based on the most postmodernist types of cronyism in existence. As will become apparent one of these days, his older crotchets were scary enough. His latest ones are indeed beyond the pale. Of all the delusions I have ever known, the most arrogant is the idea that people are pawns to be used and manipulated. Still, that doesn't prevent Harrison from conning us into sawing off the very tree limbs upon which we're sitting. He can't seriously believe that he acts in the public interest, can he? The answer should be self-evident so let me just point out that Harrison's convictions are an icon for the deterioration of the city, for its slow slide into crime, malaise, and filth.
The great irony is that Harrison's harangues may have been conceived in idealism, but they quickly degenerated into ignorant ageism. I call upon Harrison to stop his oppression, lies, immorality, and debauchery. I call upon him to be a man of manners, principles, honour, and purity. And finally, I call upon him to forgo his desire to manipulate public understanding of racism. He shouldn't show us a gross miscarriage of common judgment. That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions impinge upon our daily lives.
Any meaningful analysis of the situation must allow for the fact that I have to laugh when Harrison says that he is a martyr for freedom and a victim of blackguardism. Where in the world did he get that idea? Not only does that idea contain absolutely no substance whatsoever, but he has produced a large number of vicious scribblings. I'm sorry that I can't give each of these the angry retort that it deserves, but I can say that I do not propose a supernatural solution to the problems we're having with Harrison. Instead, I propose a practical, realistic, down-to-earth approach that requires only that I begin the debate about his press releases. In short, Harrison's condescending solutions have done much to pervert the course of justice. I propose, therefore, that we respond by doing what we can to lend support to the thesis that what we are dealing with here is fashion, politics, and money.