I Have a Life

How is this worse? Is there some kind of unwritten standard to Funhouse threads? I thought this entire subforum was made just for the purpose of spam.

I'll say it since no one else is: generally Funhouse threads are actually made with purpose, or constitute "intelligent spam;" that is, clever/witty spam carefully created for the sole purpose of being funny. They typically don't need companion threads to heighten the joke, though when they do and such threads are executed well, it's all the more hilarious.

What you've been doing the past few days, however, would be pointless and ignored to begin with since the threads aren't that funny, but instead they're increasingly annoying due to your incessant clamoring in each for personal attention. In general, however, what you're doing is being a chronic smart aleck; it's clear you're an intelligent person who understands the rules and even understands the, yes, unwritten standard to Funhouse threads that I stated above. But you're clearly out to to prove something, since poor Harry was probably hurt by some little incident weeks or months ago in the Funhouse, and wants to drive home the idea that this forum is just for spam.

We got all of that out of your first thread. You don't need to make 4059837908750 more over the course of a week to further underscore it. That's why you're getting responses like the ones in this thread, because we're tired of your bullshit.

wtp is with people stalking the forum for certain people's posts, just to repost their personal stuff in another thread. I definitely don't agree with that. If someone says something in one thread, don't bring it to another to bash them.

I also mean Frozen night's thread where he posted stuff about 21 and Meta too. wtp.

Please to note I was quite literally copying the style of his post right before that one in which he posted stuff about Sarah to bolster his contentions. But in general that bolded section is lolz. You must really hate prosecuting attorneys who bring in statements the defendant has said at other times unrelated to the trial at hand in order to construct a particular image of said defendant in the eyes of the jury.

Welcome to the real world, brah, where society's perception of you is *gasp* not based off moment-by-moment statements, but by the whole conglomerate of statements made over the course of life.