2011-04-29, 04:12 PM
MetaSeraphim Wrote:You should at least try to form a counter-argument about why people are stubborn instead of "LOL they're stubborn.".
Sex? Since when was sex part of this debate? Pretty sure it is about exploiting children.
What point is there if everything has already been covered. If you didn't see the giant wall of text from earlier than go back a few pages.
What people consider offensive varies from communities to the different people inside them. As long as the material isn't obscene and doesn't exploit REAL children it is legal at least in the United States.
What am I trying to get at with this? It doesn't matter what you think, nor does it matter what I think. The material in question is fine to have so people can whine all they want but for those who enjoy it they are free to do so as long as what they do is legal.
I don't deal with internet arguments as like this one they dissolve into circlejerks for ideologues where people don't even provide credible evidence so you can't even learn anything from it.
And sex has everything to deal with this debacle as it was the alleged sexualization of child-like images in the video that offended so many people. The exploitation of children especially for prurient interests is illegal. There is no debate there, you're comparing apples to oranges at this point but I can see where the confusion lies in that the argument isn't even consistent.
[SIZE="5"]offensive=/=obscene but obscene =offensive(most of the time)[/SIZE]
inb4 more no true scottsman bullpomegranate
