2011-04-29, 02:25 AM
Yeah but that's like earlier today at work. Some crazy old guy brought up a little model of an Angel holding a baby. He literally, I mean literally, told me that this should not be allowed. As it ''implies'' angels have sex, which is blah blah blah religious stuff.
I didn't really see it that way, I saw it as a angel holding a child.
No one bares the responsibility of making something to where it can not be interpreted another way. Many, many, slangs and words (even in the Army) can be taken sexually if you think about it.
Although I'm positive you have no stake in this talk to begin with, I don't really have one either.
I didn't really see it that way, I saw it as a angel holding a child.
No one bares the responsibility of making something to where it can not be interpreted another way. Many, many, slangs and words (even in the Army) can be taken sexually if you think about it.
Although I'm positive you have no stake in this talk to begin with, I don't really have one either.