2011-04-15, 11:06 PM
Imagine Wrote:Yeah, it does. Or else I can accuse anyone of molesting me and get away with it. I mean, since validity doesn't rely on how well I can justify that accusation, there's no need for me to prove that statement, and anyone I accuse will enjoy the miracles of jail.
And you're implying that intelligence is based of what you know, which is complete bullpomegranate. What makes a person "intelligent" is subjective; I can easy smother you with evidence of my school's extremely high rankings (which I can) in anything related to education and claim that that makes me smart.
And the fact that you're dragging away the conversation from DBs to the validity of your arguments spells Chewbacca defence for me; every single thing you've said is bullpomegranate you cannot back up as an attempt to redeem your nonexistent "intelligence". So I reiterate the following statement: prove your claims.
Validity pertains to the structure of the argument and whether the conclusion follows from the premises. You are so wrong and so far off, its pathetic your still trying to refute everything I say.
CautionSin Wrote:Validity doesn't rely on support, please if your going to use logic terms, learn their meanings.
I didn't mention anything on intelligence, your inferences are absurd.
The last part doesn't say anything.