Why do I complain about DBs?

1. I'm saying your arguments suck because you're too thick-headed to understand that your arguments blatantly suck; unlike you, my arguments have been backed up sufficiently. I have no need to strengthen my arguments against you; I just feel the need to drill this into your head.
2. Fighting over a statement through the use of logic and reasoning to reach a conclusion is by definition an argument. Let's ignore the fact that you have not successfully employed either logic or reasoning. As stated before, your evidences are claims. Claims are not seen as valid until they have been backed up, which you have failed to do.
3. We're attacking you over the premise that you're an idiot. In case you failed to receive the usual welcome message:

1. Your arguments contain no support, I say something like dual blades suck, you say they don't and say my argument sucks or worse invalid. My arguments were all quite valid, I dont think i have to spell it out in basic form.
2. my "argument" was valid, you obviously don't understand the word validity within an argument
3. ok, let's have a real intellectual discussion, I have just created a thread in the rubix cube section titled "Logical approach to scientific hypotheses."