Why do I complain about DBs?

Prove it. Hell you can't even remember what statements that you're typing out to fight your own argument. Your entire argument is halved, you're trying to argue that equal funding would leave limited difference, and that you need x amount of funding to be good. So what are you really trying to say here, cus uh, dual means, two, which kind of means that he weilds two weapons, each with a seperate range. I don't know, I have a feeling you don't have an understanding of the concept.

Dual doesn't mean 2, just 2 is an essential component of dual. As for two meaning two weapons, no. 2 ranges, I'm pretty sure I have one, right now the katara and dagger attack separately. The source of strength for a dual blade rests in 60+% total damage multiplier (which has a possibility of not reaching gms, unlikely it will) and good (subjective, right? Haha) equips. These dual blades with 20k or 12k range that I have posted don't match with a similarly funded wh or mech or bam (under the circumstances that they can buy twice as "high of numbers on their equips," talking about bam now, and int equips). I think I've said this all once before. Dual blades suck in terms of funding, the end. (though I suppose my unauthentic, conclusive vocabulary won't stop you from replying yet again).

Dual blades suck. They are worse than other similarly funded classes.