2011-03-17, 02:55 PM
CommanderJinn Wrote:I sort of agree with the above, I haven't read through all the sources yet, but I've gotten up to healthcare. And frankly, I either don't get your point or I find your source to be complete crackpot nonsense.
First of all, the so called "Czars". It's a make believe term that media put on officials who are heads of and overlooking policy, similarly to how ministers work in parliamentary systems. The previous administration had 33 of them.
Regarding appointing judges. Every different administration had appointed supreme court judges that lean in the same direction of that administration. The judges were primarily right wing during the Bush administration.
Executive order: It's all part of the job. Bush made 290 of them. His father made 165.
Domestic army... I don't even want to say how absurd that "article" was. If anything it's an editorial in a some right wing web journal.
Healthcare: Same source gets the same criticism. Also to rebut your point you made in the other thread, your healthcare system is nearly non-existent. I don't see what there is to change in the first place.
Anyways, off to bed.
Ok, I can see where you might think that way. That said, if you really want to learn the truth in any giving circumstance, you have to do research. That means looking up multiple different sources and gathering the various pieces of the puzzle and then putting those pieces together. Basically what I am saying is investigate as if you were going to investigate a crime scene. That said, just looking at the one source I put up does not constitute the full picture.
As for the czars, the media did not in fact make up the term. If you look up the meaning of the word then you look at how these people got their position and who they answer to you can come to the conclusion that the word is appropriate. Here is a video clip of the senate talking about these czars. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlEiu0bXRLQ Note that this is just one example, there are more.
The judges part, again this is also another example of not looking into the facts and doing enough investigating. Yes each administration has appionted judges, however Obama is the only one that I have been able to find that has end run the system to put people in that he wanted.
Executive orders, its not the number of orders that is disturbing to me but rather the orders themselves. If you read those orders you will find it quite disturbing too. There are far too many of them to list and you really have to look them up to find out.
Domestic army, I really did lol at your comment on this. Here is another example of non-investigation. I provide video proof this time, again this is only one example of many. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rQ3CHKm9ZuY
Healthcare, anyone who has read the entire 1000+ page bill will find the problems with it that many who have been criticized have found. Anyone who has not read the bill is blind to what its purpose is. Here is one example of Obama doudle talking in reference to this bill. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p-bY92mcOdk
I realize that you have not gone any further on my other post and I hope that with the videos in this one that I dont need to continue to show more proof. The simple truth is that many people like to go through life with "blinders" on. I am not one of those people. I see things and if I have questions I investigate. I dont get mad and start yelling about it, I look into it and find out exactly what is going on. This way I can better prepare myself for the issues that will follow. This country is heading for some serious trouble in the near futur and I for one will not be caught off guard by it. I have this many times before and I will say it again. I would rather face the dangers than give up my freedoms. What that means is that I will not let the government tell me that something is for my own good but it comes with a price of loosing a "little" freedom. At any rate, I hope this helps you to see my point.