2011-03-17, 01:40 AM
I sort of agree with the above, I haven't read through all the sources yet, but I've gotten up to healthcare. And frankly, I either don't get your point or I find your source to be complete crackpot nonsense.
First of all, the so called "Czars". It's a make believe term that media put on officials who are heads of and overlooking policy, similarly to how ministers work in parliamentary systems. The previous administration had 33 of them.
Regarding appointing judges. Every different administration had appointed supreme court judges that lean in the same direction of that administration. The judges were primarily right wing during the Bush administration.
Executive order: It's all part of the job. Bush made 290 of them. His father made 165.
Domestic army... I don't even want to say how absurd that "article" was. If anything it's an editorial in a some right wing web journal.
Healthcare: Same source gets the same criticism. Also to rebut your point you made in the other thread, your healthcare system is nearly non-existent. I don't see what there is to change in the first place.
Anyways, off to bed.
First of all, the so called "Czars". It's a make believe term that media put on officials who are heads of and overlooking policy, similarly to how ministers work in parliamentary systems. The previous administration had 33 of them.
Regarding appointing judges. Every different administration had appointed supreme court judges that lean in the same direction of that administration. The judges were primarily right wing during the Bush administration.
Executive order: It's all part of the job. Bush made 290 of them. His father made 165.
Domestic army... I don't even want to say how absurd that "article" was. If anything it's an editorial in a some right wing web journal.
Healthcare: Same source gets the same criticism. Also to rebut your point you made in the other thread, your healthcare system is nearly non-existent. I don't see what there is to change in the first place.
Anyways, off to bed.