2011-03-14, 09:52 PM
Anonymous Moose Wrote:Not all coastal areas are off limits. What needs to happen is that they should pick areas of low risk. The problem was that these plants where built in areas of high risk with too high of siesmic activity.
You're seriously saying you know better than people in the job that requires the most careful planning in the whole wide world? I'm not expert in one field, let alone the combination of the others, but I think it's fair to leave this kind of stuff to the people who know what they're doing and not wreck a mess about it. They managed to cold shutdown the reactors with NO contamination spread. I would say they did well.
Of course they should have scrapped the reactors and made new ones (which may or may not have survived this incident) three years ago just because someone wanted them to, and the blame is on them for not taking that presumably negative cost-effective course of action jussssst because it was ratified that the reactors could go for another decade after inspection. They still did well enough to preserve the safety of the large in the problem at hand, at present.
Blame could be distributed later where due.