Anonymous Moose Wrote:"Mr Barrell says the latest crisis will continue to fuel local opposition to the plants."
Read again, the reason for the title is to say that this event will be used to oppose newer nuclear power plants, just like how 3-mile island and Chernobyl where used in opposition of nuclear power.
And that makes "40 years is too old" a valid fact because?
Anonymous Moose Wrote:Anyway, the Japanese government is incompetent they where warned of this sort of disaster years ago.
"A JAPANESE expert on nuclear safety warned more than three years ago that the policy of building large numbers of reactors in the middle of a volatile earthquake zone could lead to catastrophe. "
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/japans-n...6020553408
Why even live there at all? Why did the IAEA allow the Japanese to, or at least not disallow them to, build the plants in the first place?
Also, it does not make them any more incompetent when a warning has been issued priorly, why you ask? Because it's pineappleing common sense that Japan is on a hot stove, they don't need warning to know that they live in "a volatile earthquake zone" and that putting a bomb on it is kinda a bad idea. I can give any of those warnings too, if you want.